Stop paying for seats nobody uses.
SaaS spend creeps up one seat and one renewal at a time. Because Driply already tracks every tool, seat, and cost, it can show you run-rate, the spend you can recover, and the renewals coming due, before they auto-charge.
Monthly run-rate
$4,120
- Notion · 6 idle seats$90/mo
- Figma + Sketch · overlapping$140/mo
- Linear · renews in 9d$240/yr
Driply is access governance first, but because it already records every tool, its seats, and what each costs, it doubles as a clear read on SaaS spend. You see run-rate, the cost sitting in idle and duplicated seats, and which renewals are about to charge, without a separate spend tool to set up.
SaaS spend leaks where nobody is looking
Software spend rarely blows up in one purchase. It leaks. A seat kept after someone left, a tool two teams bought separately, an annual plan that auto-renews the week before anyone reviews it. Each is small; together they’re a line item nobody can fully explain.
The reason it’s hard to control is that the cost data and the access data live apart. Finance sees the invoice but not who actually uses the seat; IT sees the access but not the dollars. Without both in one place, “are we still using this?” is a guess.
It gets harder still because most tools sell more than one kind of seat. Ten people on a cheap seat and two on an expensive one is not twelve people at the average, so any figure built on one price per tool is wrong before you start. Driply records what each tool actually sells, seat by seat, and sums the real thing.
Run-rate, at a glance
See total monthly spend and what each tool, team, and seat costs, computed from the license costs you already record, in your base currency.
Recover what’s wasted
Idle seats, offboarded holders still on a license, and duplicated tools are surfaced as recoverable spend, a concrete number you can act on, not a vague sense that you’re overpaying.
No renewal surprises
A renewal forecast and cash calendar show what’s coming due and when, so you review before the charge lands instead of after.
The result, Spend you can explain, and a number you can actually recover.
Spend visibility, because access is already on the record
Dedicated SaaS-spend tools work by integrating with your finance and SSO systems and reconciling the two, a real project. Driply gets to the same answers from the other direction: you’re already keeping an access register, and that register knows the tools, the seats, who holds them, and what they cost. Spend insight falls out of data you maintain anyway.
Because access and cost sit on the same record, the questions that usually need a meeting answer themselves: which seats are idle, which tools overlap, what a team actually spends, and what you’d save by reclaiming a license. Spend analytics are available on Business and up; the underlying cost and renewal tracking is on every plan.
One honest boundary: Driply shows you the spend and what to do about it. It doesn’t connect to billing systems or cancel subscriptions for you. You reclaim the seat or end the renewal; Driply makes sure you can see exactly where to look.
Driply documents and proves access. It doesn’t provision or revoke inside your tools, and by design never writes to them. You stay in control of the actual access.
Questions, answered.
- Is Driply a SaaS spend management tool?
- It’s an access governance tool that doubles as one. Because it already tracks every tool, seat, and cost, it shows run-rate, recoverable spend, and renewals, without a separate integration into your finance stack.
- How does Driply find wasted spend?
- It cross-references cost with access: idle seats, offboarded people still on a license, and duplicated tools become a concrete recoverable-spend figure you can act on.
- Will it stop tools from auto-renewing?
- It warns you in time, a renewal forecast and cash calendar show what’s due and when, but you end or renegotiate the subscription yourself. Driply surfaces; it doesn’t transact.